América do Sul
URI permanente desta comunidadehttps://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/handle/bdtse/9850
Navegar
4 resultados
Resultados da Pesquisa
Artigo From antipetismo to generalized antipartisanship : the impact of rejection of political parties on the 2018 : vote for Bolsonaro(2021) Fuks, Mario; Ribeiro, Ednaldo Aparecido; Borba, Julian; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt analyzes the effects of antipartisanship in explaining the Bolsonaro vote in the 2018 presidential elections. The expansion of the anti-Workers' Party sentiment known in Portuguese as 'antipetismo' into an antipartisanship that accommodates a wider range of targets and a growing association between antipartisanship and political intolerance provide the context for and underscore the relevance of our tests. The expectation is that the vote for Bolsonaro was strong related to both antipetismo and negative attitudes towards mainstream political parties, especially when such attitudes were intense. The empirical basis of the present work was data from the Barometer of the Americas (LAPOP), particularly from the 2018/2019 wave. Empirical tests indicate that antipartisanship in its varied forms is a relevant phenomenon and had a major role in defining the electoral choices of 2018, particularly in the vote for Bolsonaro.Artigo Populism in Brazil's 2018 general elections : an analysis of Bolsonaro's campaign speeches(2020) Tamaki, Eduardo Ryo; Fuks, Mario; Tribunal Superior EleitoralThrough an analysis of Bolsonaro's speeches during his official campaign, we aim to identify the presence of populist traits in his discourse. Preliminary results suggest that Bolsonaro's discourse have, compared to its predecessors, higher levels of populism. As a theoretical framework, we use the ideational approach to populism. The data was collected and analyzed by Team Populism using the "holistic grading" textual analysis method. Results revealed that, despite his anti-elite, polarizing, and Manichean speech, Bolsonaro is an incomplete populist. In his rhetoric, populist traits vie for space with patriotic elements.Artigo Trust and political information : attitudinal change in participants in the Youth Parliament in Brazil(2012) Fuks, Mario; Casalecchi, Gabriel Avila; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt analyzes the impact of socializing experiences on the political attitudes of youngsters. More specifically, our goal is to evaluate the impact of the Youth Parliament program on youngsters confidence levels in the Minas Gerais State Assembly (MGSA). The analysis focuses on the cognitive foundations of attitudes and results show a substantial increase in confidence levels in MGSA, an increase associated with the acquisition of information on the institution. It is asserted that the increase in confidence in MGSA represents and attitudinal gain. The study design involves quasi-experimental research on a non-random sample. We conducted two rounds of interviews in 2008, prior and subsequent to the program, with 335 participants (167 in the treatment group; and 168 in the control group).Artigo Are dissatisfied democrats critical? Reevaluating the concept of the critical citizen(2017) Fuks, Mario; Casalecchi, Gabriel Avila; Araújo, Mateus Morais; Tribunal Superior EleitoralSeveral studies have used the terms critical citizen and dissatisfied democrat interchangeably, assuming that both address the same citizen profile. However, recent studies conducted in new democracies have questioned this assumption, arguing that those who are dissatisfied are not always critical. This article investigates this question based on a comparison of the United States and Brazil. Beginning with the classification of two types of citizens, dissatisfied democrats and critical democrats, we appraise whether dissatisfied democrats are critical. Then, we test which of these two types of citizens is more engaged and has attitudes that are more democratic. The results show that dissatisfied democrats are not necessarily critical and that critical democrats are more engaged in politics and more committed to democracy than non-critical democrats.