América do Sul

URI permanente desta comunidadehttps://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/handle/bdtse/9850

Navegar

Filtros

2012 - 20162

Configurações

Autor: search.filters.author.Rocha, Enivaldo Carvalho daAssunto: search.filters.subject.Financiamento eleitoral

Resultados da Pesquisa

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Outro
    Campaign finance in comparative perspective : a nested analysis approach
    (2012) Figueiredo Filho, Dalson Britto; Melo, Natália Maria Leitão de; Rocha, Enivaldo Carvalho da; Silva Junior, José Alexandre da; Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
    It analyzes campaign finance in a comparative perspective, giving special attention to Brazil and the Unites States. The focus regards the level of regulation on the sources of campaign contributions. Methodologically, the research design adopts a nested approach, combining descriptive and multivariate statistics with deep case studies and documental analysis. Additionally, we replicate data from the Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) to estimate a standardized measure of regulation. The results suggest that most countries show low levels of control over the sources of campaign contributions. However, both Brazil and the United States display high levels of regulation on campaign finance, despite their widely different institutional designs.
  • Imagem de Miniatura
    Artigo
    Corporate dependence in Brazil's 2010 elections for federal deputy
    (2016) Mancuso, Wagner Pralon; Figueiredo Filho, Dalson Britto; Speck, Bruno Wilhelm; Silva, Lucas Emanuel Oliveira; Rocha, Enivaldo Carvalho da; Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
    It identifies factors that help explaining the level of corporate dependence among the candidates. It answers the question in relation to the 2010 elections for federal deputy in Brazil. It tests five hypotheses: 01. right-wing party candidates are more dependent than their counterparts on the left; 02. government coalition candidates are more dependent than candidates from the opposition; 03. incumbents are more dependent on corporate donations than challengers; 04. businesspeople running as candidates receive more corporate donations than other candidates; and 05. male candidates are more dependent than female candidates. Methodologically, the research design combines both descriptive and multivariate statistics. It uses OLS regression, cluster analysis and the Tobit model. The results show support for hypotheses 01, 03 and 04. There is no empirical support for hypothesis 05. Finally, hypothesis 02 was not only rejected, but we find evidence that candidates from the opposition receive more contributions from the corporate sector.