América do Sul
URI permanente desta comunidadehttps://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/handle/bdtse/9850
Navegar
9 resultados
Resultados da Pesquisa
Artigo Las Elecciones Generales 2022 de Brasil : una mirada longitudinal a los desafíos de la democracia(2022) Simpson, Ximena; Tribunal Superior EleitoralA partir de un análisis sistémico y longitudinal de las elecciones generales de 2022 en Brasil, se ponen en relevancia tres elementos clave: 1) la emergencia de la extrema derecha radical, apuntalada por 2) el mayor uso de las redes sociales como estrategia de campaña y 3) una mayor presencia de sectores militares en puestos de la administración pública y en la arena de representación. Estos elementos permiten plantear el inicio de un nuevo paradigma político, con importantes consecuencias para el régimen democrático y el sistema político brasileño. En la parte final del artículo se abordan posibles escenarios futuros a partir de su conexión con los tres aspectos presentados.Outro People against the elite? Jair Bolsonaro's presidential campaign(2018) Chueri, Juliana; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt aims to identify and characterize the populist rhetoric of Jair Bolsonaro, candidate for the Brazilian presidency in the October 2018 election. Applying the methodology proposed by Rooduijn and Pauwels (2011), I analyze the candidate's personal tweets from 5 May 2018 to 5 September 2018. The conclusion is that populism is an important element of Bolsonaro's rhetoric. First, he attacks political elites, accuses them of corruption, and blames them for the economic and political crises. Second, he appeals to the Brazilian people and claims to be the only candidate who will govern in their interest. Nevertheless, the construction of 'us', 'the people' is drawn in an exclusionary manner: he denies the existence of class, race, and gender conflicts; opposes minority rights; and does not present initiatives for social inclusion. Therefore, Bolsonaro detaches from Latin American inclusionary populism and shows similarities to Western European exclusionary populism. This fact is also illustrated by the radical aspect of his rhetoric: law and order are highly salient in his discourse, the second most frequent topic of his tweets. Finally, Bolsonaro embraces the free market economy, but as with other populist politicians, distributive issues have very limited space in his discourse.Artigo Did brazilians vote for Jair Bolsonaro because they share his most controversial views?(2021) Setzler, Mark; Tribunal Superior EleitoralThe similarity of Jair Bolsonaro's and Donald Trump's divisive views on a variety of controversial issues has led many critics to argue that Brazilians elected a 'Tropical Trump' in 2018. Research on Trump's election shows that authoritarian, racist, and sexist voters were essential to his narrow victory; however, it is an open question whether Trump's pathway to power is the norm or the exception among right-wing nationalists. Even though candidates espousing controversial ideas about democracy and prejudice are gaining much electoral support, it knows little about the extent to which their voters hold similar views. This study confirms that many Brazilians share Bolsonaro's ambivalence about democracy as well as his attitudes denigrating women and sexual minorities; however, the degree of congruence between his supporters' and his own views on these topics played a minor role at most in shaping voter choice. As in previous elections, ideology and partisanship - specifically, attitudes about Brazil's Workers' Party - largely explain whether a voter supported him. This finding largely holds across gender and racial boundaries, although white Brazilians appear to have been modestly more inclined than Afro-Brazilians to vote for Bolsonaro if they shared his divisive views.Artigo Jair Bolsonaro and the dominant counterpublicity(2021) Rocha, Camila; Medeiros, Jonas; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt focuses on the controversial and infamous behavior of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro in the public sphere. Based on an understanding that there exists something specific in relation to his strategy of rhetorical mobilization and the discursive domination related to broader dynamics in the Brazilian public sphere, it seeks to analyze here the use of what it considers to be a 'dominant counterpublicity'.Artigo From antipetismo to generalized antipartisanship : the impact of rejection of political parties on the 2018 : vote for Bolsonaro(2021) Fuks, Mario; Ribeiro, Ednaldo Aparecido; Borba, Julian; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt analyzes the effects of antipartisanship in explaining the Bolsonaro vote in the 2018 presidential elections. The expansion of the anti-Workers' Party sentiment known in Portuguese as 'antipetismo' into an antipartisanship that accommodates a wider range of targets and a growing association between antipartisanship and political intolerance provide the context for and underscore the relevance of our tests. The expectation is that the vote for Bolsonaro was strong related to both antipetismo and negative attitudes towards mainstream political parties, especially when such attitudes were intense. The empirical basis of the present work was data from the Barometer of the Americas (LAPOP), particularly from the 2018/2019 wave. Empirical tests indicate that antipartisanship in its varied forms is a relevant phenomenon and had a major role in defining the electoral choices of 2018, particularly in the vote for Bolsonaro.Artigo The brazilian conservative wave, the Bolsonaro administration, and religious actors(2021) Burity, Joanildo A. (Joanildo Albuquerque); Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt seeks to trace various dimensions of the trajectory made by evangelicals in brazilian politics as a tipping factor in the emergence of a new protagonism of religious actors in politics. It discusses how the emergence of evangelicals as public actors has included different ideological and practical expressions, as well as internal disputes and ventures some remarks on whither current trends point to as Bolsonaro's government makes room for the evangelical right but sparks reactions and rearticulations from various forms of evangelical progressives.Artigo The victory of Jair Bolsonaro according to the brazilian electoral study of 2018(2020) Amaral, Oswaldo E. do; Tribunal Superior EleitoralIt identifies the determinants of votes for Jair Bolsonaro in the two rounds of the 2018 presidential election from data collected by the Brazilian Electoral Study. By means of multivariate analyses of the two rounds of the presidential election, it found that flourishing 'antipetismo' (i.e. anti-Workers' Party sentiment), growing numbers of voters self-identifying as right wing and increased importance of variables linked to voters' political identification all underpinned the victory of Jair Bolsonaro.Artigo Bolsonaro y la estrategia política de polarización : de la campaña a la presidencia(2021) Goldstein, Ariel; Tribunal Superior EleitoralDurante la campaña presidencial de 2018, el candidato Jair Bolsonaro incentivó y usufructuó de una "ola antipetista" existente en el electorado, basada en las acusaciones de corrupción contra los gobiernos de Lula y Dilma Rousseff (2003-2016). Esto le permitió obtener un apoyo fundamental en su carrera a la presidencia. El candidato fomentó la división entre los que apoyaban a los gobiernos del PT y sus detractores para alimentar su postulación, capitalizando el antipetismo. Su campaña fue construyendo representaciones dicotómicas para mantener su base conservadora unificada. Planteó temáticas divisorias en distintas esferas del debate público, como el lugar de la mujer en la sociedad, el temor sobre el traslado a Brasil de la crisis venezolana en el caso de un triunfo del PT y los problemas de la seguridad pública, que fueron centrales para el éxito de su estrategia de campaña. La utilización de una representación estereotipada sobre las movilizaciones del #Elenao sucedidas en septiembre de 2018, fue clave en su estrategia de polarización para postularse en defensa de un Brasil conservador, respetuoso de las tradiciones y las jerarquías. La originalidad del artículo radica en mostrar cómo la polarización, ya presente en los años de Lula y Rousseff, pasa de un clivaje basado en una nominación económica (ricos-pobres) a una división de naturaleza moral (conservadoraizquierdista).Artigo Populism in Brazil's 2018 general elections : an analysis of Bolsonaro's campaign speeches(2020) Tamaki, Eduardo Ryo; Fuks, Mario; Tribunal Superior EleitoralThrough an analysis of Bolsonaro's speeches during his official campaign, we aim to identify the presence of populist traits in his discourse. Preliminary results suggest that Bolsonaro's discourse have, compared to its predecessors, higher levels of populism. As a theoretical framework, we use the ideational approach to populism. The data was collected and analyzed by Team Populism using the "holistic grading" textual analysis method. Results revealed that, despite his anti-elite, polarizing, and Manichean speech, Bolsonaro is an incomplete populist. In his rhetoric, populist traits vie for space with patriotic elements.